This section covers:
 Introduction to Systems
 Solving Systems by Graphing
 Solving Systems with Substitution
 Solving Systems with Linear Combination or Elimination
 Types of Equations
 Algebra Word Problems with Systems:
 More Practice
Note that we solve Algebra Word Problems without Systems here, and we solve systems using matrices in the Matrices and Solving Systems with Matrices section here.
Introduction to Systems
“Systems of equations” just means that we are dealing with more than one equation and variable. So far, we’ve basically just played around with the equation for a line, which is \(y=mx+b\).
But let’s say we have the following situation.
You’re going to the mall with your friends and you have $200 to spend from your recent birthday money. You discover a store that has all jeans for $25 and all dresses for $50. You really, really want to take home 6 items of clothing because you “need” that many new things.
Wouldn’t it be clever to find out how many pairs of jeans and how many dresses you can buy so you use the whole $200 (tax not included – your parents promised to pay the tax)?
Now, you can always do “guess and check” to see what would work, but you might as well use algebra! It’s much better to learn the algebra way, because even though this problem is fairly simple to solve, the algebra way will let you solve any algebra problem – even the really complicated ones.
The first trick in problems like this is to figure out what we want to know. This will help us decide what variables (unknowns) to use. What we want to know is how many pairs of jeans we want to buy (let’s say “\(j\)”) and how many dresses we want to buy (let’s say “\(d\)”). Always write down what your variables will be:
Let \(j=\) the number of jeans you will buy
Let \(d=\) the number of dresses you’ll buy
Like we did before, let’s translate wordforword from math to English:
English 
Math 
Explanation 
“You really, really want to take home 6 items of clothing because you need that many.” 
\(j+d=6\) 
If you add up the pairs of jeans and dresses, you want to come up with 6 items. 
“… you have $200 to spend from your recent birthday money. You discover a store that has all jeans for $25 and all dresses for $50.” 
\(25j+50d=200\) 
This one’s a little trickier. Use easier numbers if you need to: if you buy 2 pairs of jeans and 1 dress, you spend \(\left( {2\times \$25} \right)+\left( {1\times \$50} \right)\). Now you can put the variables in with their prices, and they have to add up to $200. 
Now we have the 2 equations as shown below. Notice that the \(j\) variable is just like the \(x\) variable and the \(d\) variable is just like the \(y\). It’s easier to put in \(j\) and \(d\) so we can remember what they stand for when we get the answers.
This is what we call a system, since we have to solve for more than one variable – we have to solve for 2 here. The cool thing is to solve for 2 variables, you typically need 2 equations, to solve for 3 variables, you need 3 equations, and so on. That’s easy to remember, right?
We need to get an answer that works in both equations; this is what we’re doing when we’re solving; this is called solving simultaneous systems, or solving system simultaneously.
There are several ways to solve systems; we’ll talk about graphing first.
Solving Systems by Graphing
Remember that when you graph a line, you see all the different coordinates (or \(x/y\) combinations) that make the equation work. In systems, you have to make both equations work, so the intersection of the two lines shows the point that fits both equations (assuming the lines do in fact intersect; we’ll talk about that later). So the points of intersections satisfy both equations simultaneously.
We’ll need to put these equations into the \(y=mx+b\) (\(d=mj+b\)) format, by solving for the \(d\) (which is like the \(y\)):
\(\displaystyle j+d=6;\text{ }\,\text{ }\text{solve for }d:\text{ }d=j+6\text{ }\)
\(\displaystyle 25j+50d=200;\text{ }\,\,\text{solve for }d:\text{ }d=\frac{{20025j}}{{50}}=\frac{1}{2}j+4\)
Now let’s graph:
Graph 
Explanation 
First of all, to graph, we had to either solve for the “\(y\)” value (“\(d\)” in our case) like we did above, or use the coverup, or intercept method.
The easiest way for the second equation would be the intercept method; when we put 0 in for “\(d\)”, we get 8 for the “\(j\)” intercept; when we put 0 in for “\(j\)”, we get 4 for the “\(d\)” intercept.
We can do this for the first equation too, or just solve for “\(d\)”.
We can see the two graphs intercept at the point \((4,2)\). This means that the numbers that work for both equations is 4 pairs of jeans and 2 dresses! 
We can see the two graphs intercept at the point \((4,2)\). This means that the numbers that work for both equations is 4 pairs of jeans and 2 dresses!
We can also use our graphing calculator to solve the systems of equations:
Graphing Calculator Instructions 
Screen 
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}j+d=6\text{ }\\25j+50d=200\end{array}\)
Solve for \(y\,\left( d \right)\) in both equations.
Push \(Y=\) and enter the two equations in \({{Y}_{1}}=\) and \({{Y}_{2}}=\), respectively. Note that we don’t have to simplify the equations before we have to put them in the calculator.
Push GRAPH. You may need to hit “ZOOM 6” (ZoomStandard) and/or “ZOOM 0” (ZoomFit) to make sure you see the lines crossing in the graph.
(You can also use the WINDOW button to change the minimum and maximum values of your \(x\) and \(y\) values.) 

To get the point of intersection, push “2^{nd} TRACE” (CALC), and then either push 5, or move cursor down to intersect. You should see “First curve?” at the bottom.
Then push ENTER. Now you should see “Second curve?” and then press ENTER again. Now you should see “Guess?”. Push ENTER one more time, and you will get the point of intersection on the bottom! Pretty cool! 
(Note that with nonlinear equations, there will most likely be more than one intersection; an example of how to get more than one solution via the Graphing Calculator can be found in the Exponents and Radicals in Algebra section.)
There are some examples of systems of inequality here in the Linear Inequalities section.
Solving Systems with Substitution
Substitution is the favorite way to solve for many students! It involves exactly what it says: substituting one variable in another equation so that you only have one variable in that equation.
Here is the problem again:
You’re going to the mall with your friends and you have $200 to spend from your recent birthday money. You discover a store that has all jeans for $25 and all dresses for $50. You really, really want to take home 6 items of clothing because you “need” that many new things. Wouldn’t it be clever to find out how many pairs of jeans and how many dresses you can buy with your $200 (tax not included – your parents promised to pay the tax)?
Below are our two equations, and let’s solve for “\(d\)” in terms of “\(j\)” in the first equation. Then, let’s substitute what we got for “\(d\)” into the next equation.
Even though it doesn’t matter which equation you start with, remember to always pick the “easiest” equation first (one that we can easily solve for a variable) to get a variable by itself.
Steps Using Substitution 
Notes 
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\color{#800000}{\begin{array}{c}j+d=\text{ }6\\25j+50d=200\end{array}}\\\\25j+50(j+6)=200\\25j50j+300=200\\25j=100\,\,\\j=4\,\\d=j+6=4+6=2\end{array}\)  Solve for \(d\): \(\displaystyle d=j+6\). Plug this in for \(d\) in the second equation and solve for \(j\).
When you get the answer for \(j\), plug this back in the easier equation to get \(d\): \(\displaystyle d=(4)+6=2\).
The solution is \((4,2)\). 
We could buy 4 pairs of jeans and 2 dresses. Note that we could have also solved for “\(j\)” first; it really doesn’t matter. You’ll want to pick the variable that’s most easily solved for. Let’s try another substitution problem that’s a little bit different:
Steps Using Substitution 
Notes 
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\color{#800000}{\begin{array}{c}37x+4y=124\,\\x=4\,\end{array}}\\\\37(4)+4y=124\\4y=124148\\4y=24\\y=6\end{array}\)  This one is actually easier: we already know that \(x=4\).
Now plug in 4 for the second equation and solve for \(y\).
The solution is \((4,6)\). 
Solving Systems with Linear Combination or Elimination
Probably the most useful way to solve systems is using linear combination, or linear elimination. The reason it’s most useful is that usually in real life we don’t have one variable in terms of another (in other words, a “\(y=\)” situation).
The main purpose of the linear combination method is to add or subtract the equations so that one variable is eliminated. Now let’s see why we can add, subtract, or multiply both sides of equations by the same numbers – let’s use real numbers as shown below. Remember these are because of the Additive Property of Equality, Subtraction Property of Equality, Multiplicative Property of Equality, and Division Property of Equality:
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\,\,\,3\,\,=\,\,3\\\underline{{+4\,\,=\,\,4}}\\\,\,\,7\,\,=\,\,7\end{array}\)  \(\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}\,\,\,12\,=\,12\\\,\underline{{8\,\,=\,\,\,8}}\\\,\,\,\,\,4\,\,=\,\,4\end{array}\)  \(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}3\,\,=\,\,3\\4\times 3\,\,=\,\,4\times 3\\12\,\,=\,\,12\end{array}\)  \(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}12\,\,=\,\,12\\\frac{{12}}{3}\,\,=\,\,\frac{{12}}{3}\\4\,\,=\,\,4\end{array}\) 
So now if we have a set of 2 equations with 2 unknowns, we can manipulate them by adding, multiplying or subtracting (we usually prefer adding) so that we get one equation with one variable. For, example, let’s use our previous problem:
Linear Elimination Steps  Notes 
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\color{#800000}{\begin{array}{c}j+d=6\text{ }\\25j+50d=200\end{array}}\\\\\,\left( {25} \right)\left( {j+d} \right)=\left( {25} \right)6\text{ }\\\,\,\,\,25j25d\,=150\,\\\,\,\,\,\,\underline{{25j+50d\,=\,200}}\text{ }\\\,\,\,0j+25d=\,50\\\\25d\,=\,50\\d=2\\\\d+j\,\,=\,\,6\\\,2+j=6\\j=4\end{array}\)  Since we need to eliminate a variable, we can multiply the first equation by –25. Remember that we need to multiply every term (anything separated by a plus, minus, or \(=\) sign) by the –25.
Then we add the two equations to get “\(0j\)” and eliminate the “\(j\)” variable (thus, the name “linear elimination”). We then solve for “\(d\)”.
Now that we get \(d=2\), we can plug in that value in the either original equation (use the easiest!) to get the other variable.
The solution is \((4,2)\): \(j=4\) and \(d=2\). 
We could buy 4 pairs of jeans and 2 dresses.
Linear Elimination Steps  Notes 
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}\color{#800000}{{2x+5y=1}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\text{multiply by}3\\\color{#800000}{{7x+3y=11}}\text{ }\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\text{multiply by }5\end{array}\)
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}6x15y=3\,\\\,\underline{{35x+15y=55}}\text{ }\\\,29x\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,=58\\\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,x=2\\\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\\2(2)+5y=1\\\,\,\,\,\,\,4+5y=1\\\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,5y=5\\\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,y=1\end{array}\) 
Since we need to eliminate a variable, we can multiply the first equation by –3 and the second one by 5. There are many ways to do this, but we want to make sure that either the \(x\) or \(y\) will be eliminated when adding the two equations. (We could have also picked multiplying the first by –7 and the second by 2).
We then get the second set of equations to add, and the \(y\)’s are eliminated. Solving for \(x\), we get \(x=2\).
Now we can plug in that value in either original equation (use the easiest!) to get the other variable.
The solution is \((2,1)\). 
Types of equations
In the example above, we found one unique solution to the set of equations. Sometimes, however, there are no solutions (when lines are parallel) or an infinite number of solutions (when the two lines are actually the same line, and one is just a “multiple” of the other) to a set of equations.
When there is at least one solution, the equations are consistent equations, since they have a solution. When there is only one solution, the system is called independent, since they cross at only one point.
When equations have infinite solutions, they are the same equation, are consistent, and are called dependent or coincident (think of one just sitting on top of the other). When equations have no solutions, they are called inconsistent equations, since we can never get a solution.
Here are graphs of inconsistent and dependent equations that were created on the graphing calculator:
Systems of Equations Calculator Screens  Notes 
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}y=x+4\\y=x2\end{array}\)
Notice that the slope of these two equations is the same, but the \(y\)intercepts are different. In this situation, the lines are parallel, as we can see from the graph.
These types of equations are called inconsistent, since there are no solutions.
If we were to “solve” the two equations, we’d end up with “\(4=2\)”; no matter what \(x\) or \(y\) is, \(4\) can never equal \(2\). Thus, there are no solutions. 

\(\displaystyle x+y=6\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\text{or}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,y=x+6\) \(\displaystyle 2x+2y=12\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\text{or}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,y=\frac{{2x+12}}{2}=x+6\)
Sometimes we have a situation where the system contains the same equations even though it may not be obvious.
See how we may not know unless we actually graph, or simplify them?
These types of equations are called dependent or coincident since they are one and the same equation and they have an infinite number of solutions, since one “sits on top of” the other. Since they have at least one solution, they are also consistent.
If we were to “solve” the two equations, we’d end up with “\(6=6\)”, and no matter what \(x\) or \(y\) is, \(6\) always equals \(6\). Thus, there are an infinite number of solutions, but \(y\) always has to be equal to \(x+6\). We can also write the solution as \((x,x+6)\).

Systems with Three Equations
Let’s get a little more complicated with systems; in real life, we rarely just have two unknowns with two equations.
Let’s say at the same store, they also had pairs of shoes for $20 and we managed to get $60 more from our parents since our parents are so great!
Now we have a new problem: to spend the even $260, how many pairs of jeans, dresses, and pairs of shoes should we get if want say exactly 10 total items?
Let’s let \(j=\) the number of pair of jeans, \(d=\) the number of dresses, and \(s=\) the number of pairs of shoes we should buy.
So far we’ll have the following equations:
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}j+d+s=10\text{ }\\25j+\text{ }50d+\,20s=260\end{array}\)
We’ll need another equation, since for three variables, we need three equations (otherwise, we’d theoretically have infinite ways to solve the problem). In this type of problem, you would also have/need something like this: we want twice as many pairs of jeans as pairs of shoes. Now, since we have the same number of equations as variables, we can potentially get one solution for the system.
So, again, now we have three equations and three unknowns (variables). We’ll learn later how to put these in our calculator to easily solve using matrices (see the Matrices and Solving Systems with Matrices section), but for now we need to first use two of the equations to eliminate one of the variables, and then use two other equations to eliminate the same variable:
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}j+d+s=10\text{ }\\25j+50d+\,20s=260\\j=2s\end{array}\)  Note that when we say “we have twice as many pairs of jeans as pair of shoes”, it doesn’t translate that well into math.
We can think in terms of real numbers, such as if we had 8 pairs of jeans, we’d have 4 pairs of shoes. Then it’s easier to put it in terms of the variables. 
Now this gets more difficult to solve, but remember that in “real life”, there are computers to do all this work!
The trick to do these problems “by hand” is to keep working on the equations using either substitution or elimination until we get the answers.
Remember again, that if we ever get to a point where we end up with something like this, it means there are an infinite number of solutions:
\(4=4\) (variables are gone and a number equals another number and they are the same)
And if we up with something like this, it means there are no solutions:
\(5=2\) (variables are gone and two numbers are left and they don’t equal each other)
Let’s go for it and solve: \(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}j+d+s=10\text{ }\\25j+\text{ }50d+20s=260\\j=2s\end{array}\):
Solving Systems Steps 
Notes 
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}j+d+s=10\text{ }\\25j+50d+20s=260\\j=2s\end{array}\)
\(\displaystyle \begin{align}2s+d+s&=10\\25(2s)+50d+\,20s&=260\\70s+50d&=260\end{align}\)
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}150s50d=500\\\,\,\,\,\,\underline{{\,\,70s+50d=\,\,\,\,260}}\\\,\,80s\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,=240\\\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,s=3\\\\3(3)+d=10;\,\,\,\,\,d=1\,\\j=2s=2(3);\,\,\,\,\,\,j=6\end{array}\) 
Use substitution since the last equation makes that easier. We’ll substitute \(2s\) for \(j\) in the other two equations and then we’ll have 2 equations and 2 unknowns.
We then multiply the first equation by –50 so we can add the two equations to get rid of the \(d\). We could have also used substitution again.
First, we get that \(s=3\), so then we can substitute this in one of the 2 equations we’re working with.
Now we know that \(d=1\), so we can plug in \(d\) and \(s\) in the original first equation to get \(j=6\).
The solution is \((6,1,3)\). 
We could buy 6 pairs of jeans, 1 dress, and 3 pairs of shoes.
Here’s one more example of a threevariable system of equations, where we’ll only use linear elimination:
\(\displaystyle \begin{align}5x6y\,7z\,&=\,7\\6x4y+10z&=\,34\\2x+4y\,3z\,&=\,29\end{align}\)
Solving Systems Steps 
Notes 
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}5x6y\,7z\,=\,\,7\\6x4y+10z=\,34\\2x+4y\,3z\,=\,29\,\end{array}\) \(\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}6x4y+10z=34\\\underline{{2x+4y\,3z\,=\,29}}\\8x\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,+7z=5\end{array}\)
\(\require{cancel} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l}\cancel{{5x6y7z=7}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,20x24y28z\,=\,28\,\\\cancel{{2x+4y\,3z\,=29\,\,}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\underline{{12x+24y18z=174}}\\\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,32x\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,46z=202\end{array}\)
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}\,\,\,\cancel{{8x\,\,\,+7z=\,5}}\,\,\,\,\,32x\,28z=\,20\\32x\,46z=202\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\underline{{\,\,32x\,46z=202}}\\\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,74z=222\\\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,z=3\end{array}\)
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}32x46(3)=202\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,x=\frac{{202138}}{{32}}=\frac{{64}}{{32}}=2\\\\5(2)6y\,\,7(3)\,=\,\,7\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,y=\frac{{10+21+7}}{{6}}=4\end{array}\) 
We first pick any 2 equations and eliminate a variable; we’ll use equations 2 and 3 since we can add them to eliminate the \(y\).
We then use 2 different equations (one will be the same!) to also eliminate the \(y\); we’ll use equations 1 and 3. To eliminate the \(y\), we’ll have to multiply the first by 4, and the second by 6.
Now we use the 2 equations we’ve just created without the \(y\)’s and solve them just like a normal set of systems. We needed to multiply the first by –4 to eliminate the \(x\)’s to get the \(z\).
We can then get the \(x\) from the second equation that we just worked with.
Since we have the \(x\) and the \(z\), we can use any of the original equations to get the \(y\).
So the solution is \((2,4,3)\). 
I know – this is really difficult stuff! But if you do it stepbystep and keep using the equations you need with the right variables, you can do it. Think of it like a puzzle – you may not know exactly where you’re going, but do what you can in baby steps, and you’ll get there (sort of like life!).
And we’ll learn much easier ways to do these types of problems.
Also – note that equations with three variables are represented by planes, not lines (you’ll learn about this in Geometry). They could have 1 solution (if all the planes crossed in only one point), no solution (if say two of them were parallel), or an infinite number of solutions (say if two or three of them crossed in a line). OK, enough Geometry for now!
Algebra Word Problems with Systems
Let’s do more word problems; you’ll notice that many of these are the same type that we did earlier in the Algebra Word Problems section, but now we can use more than one variable. This will actually make the problems easier! Again, when doing these word problems:
 If you’re wondering what the variable (or unknown) should be when working on a word problem, look at what the problem is asking. This is usually what your variable is!
 If you’re not sure how to set up the equations, use regular numbers (simple ones!) and see what you’re doing. Then put the variables back in!
Here are some problems:
Investment Word Problem  Solution 
Suppose Lindsay’s mom invests $10,000, part at 3%, and the rest at 2.5%, in interest bearing accounts.
The totally yearly investment income (interest) is $283.
How much did Lindsay’s mom invest at each rate?

Define a variable, and look at what the problem is asking. Use two variables: let \(x=\) the amount of money invested at 3%, and \(y=\) the amount of money invested at 2.5%.
The yearly investment income or interest is the amount that we get from the yearly percentages. (This is the amount of money that the bank gives us for keeping our money there.) To get the interest, multiply each percentage by the amount invested at that rate. Add these amounts up to get the total interest. We have two equations and two unknowns. The total amount \((x+y)\) must equal 10000, and the interest \((.03x+.025y)\) must equal 283: \(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}x\,+\,y=10000\\.03x+.025y=283\end{array}\) \(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}y=10000x\\.03x+.025(10000x)=283\\\,\,\,.03x\,+\,250\,.025x=283\\\,.005x=33;\,\,\,\,x=6600\,\,\\\,\,y=100006600=3400\end{array}\)
Turn the percentages into decimals: move the decimal point two places to the left. Substitution is the easiest way to solve. Lindsay’s mom invested $6600 at 3% and $3400 at 2.5%. 
We also could have set up this problem with a table:
Amount  Turn % to decimal  Total  
Amount at 3%  \(x\)  \(.03\)  \(.03x\)  Multiply across 
Amount at 2.5%  \(y\)  \(.025\)  \(.025y\)  Multiply across 
Total  \(10000\)  \(283\)  Do Nothing Here  
Add Down:
\(x+y=10000\) 
Do Nothing Here  Add Down: \(.03x+.025y = 283\) and solve the system 
Here’s a mixture word problem:
Mixture Word Problem  Solution  
Two types of milk, one that has 1% butterfat, and the other that has 3.5% of butterfat, are mixed.
How many liters of these two different kinds of milk are to be mixed together to produce 10 liters of lowfat milk, which has 2% butterfat?
Remember that if a mixture problem calls for a pure solution (not in this problem), use 100% for the percentage!

(Note that we did a similar mixture problem using only one variable here in the Algebra Word Problems section.)
Let’s first define two variables for the number of liters of each type of milk. Let \(x=\) the number of liters of the 1% milk, and \(y=\) the number of liters of the 3.5% milk. Let’s use a table again:
We can also set up mixture problems with the type of figure below. We add up the terms inside the box, and then multiply the amounts in the boxes by the percentages above the boxes, and then add across. This will give us the two equations. Now let’s do the math (use substitution)! \(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}x\,\,+\,\,y=10\\.01x+.035y=10(.02)\end{array}\) \(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\,y=10x\\.01x+.035(10x)=.2\\.01x\,+\,.35\,\,\,.035x=.2\\\,.025x=.15;\,\,\,\,\,x=6\\\,y=106=4\end{array}\) We would need 6 liters of the 1% milk, and 4 liters of the 3.5% milk. 
Here’s another mixture problem:
Mixture Word Problem with Money  Solution  
A store sells two different types of coffee beans; the more expensive one sells for $8 per pound, and the cheaper one sells for $4 per pound.
The beans are mixed to provide a mixture of 50 pounds that sells for $6.40 per pound.
How much of each type of coffee bean should be used to create 50 pounds of the mixture?

First define two variables for the number of pounds of each type of coffee bean. Let \(x=\) the number of pounds of the $8 coffee, and \(y=\) the number of pounds of the $4 coffee.
Let’s use a table again:
Now let’s do the math (use substitution)! \(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}x+y=50\\8x+4y=50\left( {6.4} \right)\end{array}\) \(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}y=50x\\8x+4\left( {50x} \right)=320\\8x+2004x=320\\4x=120\,;\,\,\,\,x=30\\y=5030=20\\8x+4y=50(6.4)\end{array}\) We would need 30 pounds of the $8 coffee bean, and 20 pounds of the $4 coffee bean. See how similar this problem is to the one where we use percentages? 
Distance Word Problem:
Here’s a distance word problem using systems. Note that there’s an example of a Parametric Distance Problem here in the Parametric Equations section.
Distance Word Problem  Solution 
Lia walks to the mall from her house at 5 mph. 10 minutes later, Lia’s sister Megan starts riding her bike at 15 mph (from the same house) to the mall to meet Lia. They arrive at the mall the same time.
How far is the mall from the sisters’ house?
How long did it take Megan to get there?

Remember always that \(\text{distance}=\text{rate}\times \text{time}\). It’s difficult to know how to define the variables, but usually in these types of distance problems, we want to set the variables to time, since we have rates, and we’ll want to set distances equal to each other in this case (the house is always the same distance from the mall). (Sometimes we’ll need to add the distances together instead of setting them equal to each other.)
Let \(L\) equal the how long (in hours) it will take Lia to get to the mall, and \(M\) equal to how long (in hours) it will take Megan to get to the mall. The rates of the Lia and Megan are 5 mph and 15 mph respectively. (Usually a rate is “something per something”). Lia’s time is Megan’s time plus \(\frac{{10}}{{60}}=\frac{1}{6}\), since Lia left 10 minutes earlier than Megan (we have to put minutes into hours by dividing by 60 – try real numbers to see this).
Use the distance formula for each of them separately, and then set their distances equal, since they are both traveling the same distance (house to mall). Set the distances together, since the two sisters live the same distance from the mall. After “pushing through” (distributing) the 5, we multiply both sides by 6 to get rid of the fractions.
\(\begin{array}{c}L=M+\frac{1}{6};\,\,\,\,\,\,5L=15M\\5\left( {M+\frac{1}{6}} \right)=15M\\5M+\frac{5}{6}=15M\\30M+5=90M\\60M=5;\,\,\,\,\,\,M=\frac{5}{{60}}\,\,\text{hr}\text{.}\\D=15\left( {\frac{5}{{60}}} \right)=1.25\,\,\text{miles}\end{array}\)
Megan’s time is \(\frac{5}{{60}}\) of any hour, which is 5 minutes. The distance to the mall is rate times time, which is 1.25 miles.

Which Plumber Problem
Here’s another problem where we’re trying to compare two different scenarios.
Many word problems you’ll have to solve have to do with an initial charge or setup charge, and a charge or rate per time period. In these cases, the initial charge will be the \(\boldsymbol {y}\)intercept, and the rate will be the slope. Here is an example:
“Which Plumber” Systems Word Problem  Solution 
Michaela’s mom is trying to decide between two plumber companies to fix her sink.
The first company charges $50 for a service call, plus an additional $36 per hour for labor. The second company charges $35 for a service call, plus an additional $39 per hour of labor.
At how many hours will the two companies charge the same amount of money?

The money spent depends on the plumber’s set up charge and number of hours, so let \(y=\) the total cost of the plumber, and \(x=\) the number of hours of labor. Again, set up charges are typical \(\boldsymbol {y}\)intercepts, and rates per hour are slopes. The total price of the plumber’s house call will be the initial or setup charge, plus the number of hours (\(x\)) at the house times the price per hour for labor.
To get the number of hours when the two companies charge the same amount of money, we just put the two \(y\)’s together and solve for \(x\) (substitution, right?): First plumber’s total price: \(\displaystyle y=50+36x\) Second plumber’s total price: \(\displaystyle y=35+39x\)
\(\displaystyle 50+36x=35+39x;\,\,\,\,\,\,x=5\) Here’s what a graph would look like: At 5 hours, the two plumbers will charge the same. At this time, the \(y\) value is 230, so the total cost is $230. Note that, in the graph, before 5 hours, the first plumber will be more expensive (because of the higher setup charge), but after the first 5 hours, the second plumber will be more expensive. Thus, the plumber would be chosen based on how many hours Michaela’s mom thinks the plumber will be there.

Geometry Word Problem:
Many times, we’ll have a geometry problem as an algebra word problem; these might involve perimeter, area, or sometimes angle measurements (so don’t forget these things!). Let’s do one involving angle measurements.
Geometry Systems Word Problem  Solution 
Two angles are supplementary. The measure of one angle is 30 degrees smaller than twice the other.
Find the measure of each angle.

From Geometry, we know that two angles are supplementary if their angle measurements add up to 180 degrees (and remember also that two angles are complementary if their angle measurements add up to 90 degrees).
Define the variables and turn English into Math. Let \(x=\) the first angle, and \(y=\) the second angle; we really don’t need to worry at this point about which angle is bigger; the math will take care of itself.
\(x\) plus \(y\) must equal 180 degrees by definition, and also \(x=2y30\) (Remember the EnglishtoMath chart?) Solve, using substitution: \(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}x+y=180\\x=2y30\end{array}\)
\(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}2y30+y=180\\3y=210;\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,y=70\\x=2\left( {70} \right)30=110\end{array}\)
The larger angle is 110°, and the smaller is 70°. Let’s check our work: The two angles do in fact add up to 180°, and the larger angle (110°) is 30° less than twice the smaller (70°).

See – these are getting easier! Here’s one that’s a little tricky though:
Work Problem:
Let’s do a “work problem” that is typically seen when studying Rational Equations – fraction with variables in them – and can be found here in the Rational Functions, Equations and Inequalities section.
Note that there’s also a simpler version of this problem here in the Direct, Inverse, Joint and Combined Variation section.
Work Word Problem
(Systems) 
Solution 
8 women and 12 girls can paint a large mural in 10 hours.
6 women and 8 girls can paint it in 14 hours.
Find the time to paint the mural, by 1 woman alone, and 1 girl alone.

Let’s let \(w=\) the part of the job by 1 woman in 1 hour, and \(g=\) the part of the job by 1 girl in 1 hour. We have 10 hours with 8 women and 12 girls that paint the mural (do 1 job), and 14 hours with 6 women and 8 girls that paint the mural (do 1 job).
Since \(w=\) the part of the job that is completed by 1 woman in 1 hour, then \(8w=\) the amount of the job that is completed by 8 women in 1 hour. Also, if \(8w=\) the amount of the job that is completed by 8 women in 1 hour, \(10\times 8w\) is the amount of the job that is completed by 8 women in 10 hours. We can use the same logic to set up the second equation.
The whole job is 1 (this is typical in work problems), and we can set up two equations that equal 1 to solve the system.
Use linear elimination to solve the equations; it gets a little messy with the fractions, but we can get it! \(\require {cancel} \displaystyle \begin{array}{c}10\left( {8w+12g} \right)=1\text{ or }8w+12g=\frac{1}{{10}}\\\,14\left( {6w+8g} \right)=1\text{ or }\,6w+8g=\frac{1}{{14}}\end{array}\) \(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\text{Use elimination:}\\\left( {6} \right)\left( {8w+12g} \right)=\frac{1}{{10}}\left( {6} \right)\\\left( 8 \right)\left( {6w+8g} \right)=\frac{1}{{14}}\left( 8 \right)\\\cancel{{48w}}72g=\frac{3}{5}\\\cancel{{48w}}+64g=\frac{4}{7}\,\\\,8g=\frac{1}{{35}};\,\,\,\,\,g=\frac{1}{{280}}\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{c}\text{Substitute in first equation to get }w:\\\,10\left( {8w+12\cdot \frac{1}{{280}}} \right)=1\\\,80w+\frac{{120}}{{280}}=1;\,\,\,\,\,\,w=\frac{1}{{140}}\\g=\frac{1}{{280}};\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,w=\frac{1}{{140}}\end{array}\)
The answers we get is the part of the job that is completed by 1 woman or girl in 1 hour, so to get how long it would take them to do a whole job, we have to take the reciprocal. (Think about it; if we could complete \(\displaystyle \frac{1}{3}\) of a job in an hour, we could complete the whole job in 3 hours).
Thus, it would take one of the women 140 hours to paint the mural by herself, and one of the girls 280 hours to paint the mural by herself.

Three Variable Word Problem:
Let’s do one more with three equations and three unknowns:
Three Variable Word Problem  Solution 
A florist is making 5 identical bridesmaid bouquets for a wedding.
She has $610 to spend (including tax) and wants 24 flowers for each bouquet. Roses cost $6 each, tulips cost $4 each, and lilies cost $3 each. She wants to have twice as many roses as the other 2 flowers combined in each bouquet.
How many roses, tulips, and lilies are in each bouquet?
The trick is to put real numbers in to make sure you’re doing the problem correctly, and also make sure you’re answering what the question is asking! 
Look at the question being asked to define our variables: Let \(r=\) the number of roses, \(t=\) the number of tulips, and \(l=\) the number of lilies. Put the money terms together, and also the counting terms together:
\(\begin{array}{l}6r+4t+3l=610\text{ (price of each flower times number of each flower = total price)}\\\,\,\,\,\,\,\,r=2(t+l)\text{ }\text{(two times the sum of the other two flowers = number of roses)}\\\,\,\,\,\,\,r+t+l=5(24)\text{ (total flowers = }5\text{ bouquets, each with }24\text{ flowers)}\end{array}\)
Use substitution and put \(r\) from the middle equation in the other equations. Then, use linear elimination to put those two equations together – we’ll multiply the second by –5 to eliminate the \(l\). We typically have to use two separate pairs of equations to get the three variables down to two!
\(\begin{array}{c}6r+4t+3l=610\\r=2\left( {t+l} \right)\\\,r+t+l=5\left( {24} \right)\\\\6\left( {2t+2l} \right)+4t+3l=610\\\,12t+12l+4t+3l=610\\16t+15l=610\\\\\left( {2t+2l} \right)+t+l=5\left( {24} \right)\\3t+3l=120\end{array}\) \(\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\,\,16t+15l=610\\\,\,\,\,\,\,\,3t+3l=120\\\,\,\underline{{15t15l=600}}\\\,\,\,\,\,t\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,=10\\16\left( {10} \right)+15l=610;\,\,\,\,l=30\\\\r=2\left( {10+30} \right)=80\\\,\,\,\,\,\,t=10,\,\,\,l=30,\,\,\,r=80\end{array}\)
We get \(t=10\). Solve for \(l\) in this same system, and \(r\) by using the value we got for \(t\) and \(l\) – most easily in the second equation at the top.
For all the bouquets, we’ll have 80 roses, 10 tulips, and 30 lilies. Thus, for one bouquet, we’ll have \(\displaystyle \frac{1}{5}\) of the flowers, so we’ll have 16 roses, 2 tulips, and 6 lilies.

The “Candy” Problem
Sometimes we get lucky and can solve a system of equations where we have more unknowns (variables) then equations. (Actually, I think it’s not so much luck, but having good problem writers!) Here’s one like that:
More Unknowns Than Variables Problem  Solution 
Sarah buys 2 pounds of jelly beans and 4 pounds of chocolates for $4.00.
She then buys 1 pound of jelly beans and 4 pounds of caramels for $3.00.
She also buys 1 pound of jelly beans, 3 pounds of licorice and 1 pound of caramels for $1.50.
How much will it cost to buy 1 pound of each of the four candies?

Look at the question being asked to define our variables: Let \(j=\) the cost of 1 pound of jelly beans, \(o=\) the cost of 1 pound of chocolates, \(c=\) the cost of 1 pound of caramels, and \(l=\) the cost of 1 pound of licorice. Here is the system of equations:
\(\begin{array}{c}2j+4o=4\\j+4c=3\\j+3l+1c=1.5\\\text{Want: }j+o+c+l\end{array}\)
Wait! Something’s not right since we have 4 variables and 3 equations. But note that they are not asking for the cost of each candy, but the cost to buy all 4! Maybe the problem will just “work out” so we can solve it; let’s try and see.
From our three equations above (using substitution), we get values for \(o\), \(c\) and \(l\) in terms of \(j\). \(\displaystyle \begin{align}o=\frac{{42j}}{4}=\frac{{2j}}{2}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,c=\frac{{3j}}{4}\,\\j+3l+1\left( {\frac{{3j}}{4}} \right)=1.5\\4j+12l+3j=6\\\,l=\frac{{633j}}{{12}}=\frac{{33j}}{{12}}=\frac{{1j}}{4}\end{align}\) \(\require{cancel} \displaystyle \begin{align}j+o+c+l=j+\frac{{2j}}{2}+\frac{{3j}}{4}+\frac{{1j}}{4}\\=\cancel{j}+1\cancel{{\frac{1}{2}j}}+\frac{3}{4}\cancel{{\frac{j}{4}}}+\frac{1}{4}\cancel{{\frac{j}{4}}}=2\end{align}\)
When we substitute back in the sum \(\text{ }j+o+c+l\), all in terms of \(j\), our \(j\)’s actually cancel out, which is very unusual! We can’t really solve for all the variables, since we don’t know what \(j\) is. But we can see that the total cost to buy 1 pound of each of the candies is $2. Pretty cool!

You can find a Right Triangle Trigonometry systems problem here in the Right Triangle Trigonometry section.
Understand these problems, and practice, practice, practice!
For Practice: Use the Mathway widget below to try a Systems of Equations problem. Click on Submit (the blue arrow to the right of the problem) and click on Solve by Substitution or Solve by Addition/Elimination to see the answer.
You can also type in your own problem, or click on the three dots in the upper right hand corner and click on “Examples” to drill down by topic.
If you click on Tap to view steps, or Click Here, you can register at Mathway for a free trial, and then upgrade to a paid subscription at any time (to get any type of math problem solved!).
On to Algebraic Functions, including Domain and Range – you’re ready!