This section covers:

**Plotting Points Using Polar Coordinates****Polar-Rectangular Point Conversions****Drawing Polar Graphs****Converting Equations from Polar to Rectangular****Converting Equations from Rectangular to Polar****Polar Graph Points of Intersection****More Practice**

So far, we’ve plotted points using **rectangular **(or** Cartesian**)** coordinates**, since the points since we are going back and forth ** x** units, and up and down

**units.**

*y*# Plotting Points Using Polar Coordinates

In the** Polar Coordinate System**, we go around the origin or the **pole** a certain distance out, and a certain **angle** from from the** positive** ** x** axis:

The ordered pairs, called **polar coordinates**, are in the form \(\left( {r,\theta } \right)\), with **r** being the number of units from the origin or pole (if *r* > 0), like a **radius** of a circle, and \(\theta \) being the angle (in degrees or radians) formed by the ray on the positive* x* axis (

**polar axis**), going

**counter-clockwise**. If

**, the point is**

*r*< 0*r*units (like a radius) in the

**opposite direction**(across the origin or pole) of the angle \(\theta \). If \(\theta <0\), you go clockwise with the angle, starting with the positive

**axis.**

*x*So to plot the point, you typically circle around the positive * x* axis \(\theta \) degrees first, and then go out from the origin or pole

**units (if**

*r**r*is negative, go the other way (180°)

*r*units).

Here a polar graph with some points on it. Note that we typically count in increments of 15°, or \(\frac{\pi }{{12}}\).

For a point \(\left( {r,\theta } \right)\) do you see how you always go **counter-clockwise** (or **clockwise**, if you have a **negative** angle) until you reach the angle you want, and then out from the center ** r **units, if

*is*

**r****positive**? If

**is**

*r***negative**, you go in the

**opposite direction**from the angle

*units. If both*

**r****and the angle \(\theta \) are**

*r***negative**, you have to make sure you go

**clockwise**to get the angle, but in the

**opposite direction**units.

*r*You may be asked to rename a point in several different ways, for example, between \(\left[ {-2\pi ,2\pi } \right)\) or \(\left[ {-360{}^\circ ,360{}^\circ } \right)\). If we wanted to rename the point \(\left( {6,240{}^\circ } \right)\) three other different ways between \(\left[ {-360{}^\circ ,360{}^\circ } \right)\), by looking at the graph above, we’d get \(\left( {-6,60{}^\circ } \right)\), \(\left( {6,-120{}^\circ } \right)\), and \(\left( {-6,-240{}^\circ } \right)\) as examples. (Remember that 240 and –120, and 60 and –240 are

**co-terminal**angles). To get these, if the first number (

**) is negative, you want to go in the opposite direction, and if the angle is negative, you want to go clockwise instead of counterclockwise from the positive**

*r***axis.**

*x*# Polar-Rectangular Point Conversions

You will probably be asked to **convert coordinates** between **polar form** and **rectangular form**.

## Converting from Polar to Rectangular Coordinates

Let’s first convert from **polar to rectangular form**; to do this we use the following formulas, as we can see this from the graph:

This conversion is pretty straight-forward, and we’ll see examples below.

## Converting from Rectangular to Polar Coordinates

Converting from **rectangular coordinates** to **polar coordinates **can be a little trickier since we need to **check the quadrant** of the rectangular point to get the correct angle; the quadrants must match. Here are the formulas:

Again, we need to check quadrants when using the **calculator** to get \({{\tan }^{{-1}}}\). We’ll have to add the following degrees or radians when the point is in the following quadrants. (This is because the \({{\tan }^{{-1}}}\) function on the calculator only gives answers back in the interval \(\left( {-\frac{\pi }{2},\,\,\frac{\pi }{2}} \right)\)).

**Note that there can be multiple “answers” when converting from rectangular to polar**, since polar points can be represented in many different ways (co-terminal angles, positive or negative “** r**”, and so on). Thus is is typically easier to convert from polar to rectangular.

## Examples

Here are some examples; note you may be asked to convert back to polar into **degrees** or **radians. **For converting back to polar, make sure answers are either between 0 and 360° for degrees or 0 to 2*π *for radians. (And again, note that when we convert back to polar coordinates, we may not always get the same representation as the polar point we started out with.)

Here’s one where we go from **Rectangular** to **Polar** and we can’t get the angle from the Unit Circle. Note that we had to **add π to our answer** since we want Quadrant II.

Note that you can also use “**2 ^{nd} APPS (ANGLE)**” on your

**graphing calculator**to do these conversions, but you won’t get the answers with the roots in them (you’ll get decimals that aren’t “exact”). And you have to solve for the

**and**

*x***, or**

*y***and**

*r***θ**separately, and use the “

**,**” above the 7 for the comma.

Make sure you have your calculator either in DEGREES or RADIANS (in MODE), depending on what you’re working with.

# Drawing Polar Graphs

I find that drawing polar graphs is a combination of part **memorizing** and part knowing how to create polar ** t-charts**.

First, here is a table of some of the more common **polar graphs**. I included ** t**-charts in both degrees and radians.

(Note that you can also put these in your graphing **calculator**, as an example, with** radians**: MODE: RADIAN, POLAR and WINDOW: θ = [0, 2*π*], θstep = *π*/12 or *π*/6, X = [–10, 10], Y = [–6, 6], and then using “Y=” to put in the equation, or just put in graph and use ZOOM ZTRIG (option 7). By putting in smaller values of θstep, the graph is drawn more slowly and more accurately).

Here is an example:

Let’s start with polar equations that result in **circle** graphs:

Here are some polar equations that result in **lines**:

Here are graphs that we call **Cardioids** and **Limacons**. They are in the form \(r=a+b\cos \theta \) or \(r=a+b\sin \theta \).

First, the **Cardioids (Hearts)**; note that these and the **Limecon** “Loops” **touch the pole (origin)**, while the **Limecon** “Beans” do not:

Here are the **Limacons**:

Graphs of **Roses** produce “petals” and are in the form \(r=a\cos \left( {b\theta } \right)\) or \(r=a\sin \left( {b\theta } \right)\). Note that since we have the starting point for these graphs, and the distance between the petals, the *t*-chart isn’t that helpful. (In the *t*-charts, I made the Δ angle the same as the distance between petals).

Let’s start with the **cos **Rose graphs:

And here are some **sin** Rose graphs:

Note: For a **rose graph**, you may be asked to name the **order that petals are drawn**. One way to do this is to use the angle measurements \(0,\,\frac{\pi }{4},\,\frac{{3\pi }}{4},\,\frac{{5\pi }}{4},\,\frac{{7\pi }}{4}\), solve for ** r**, and observe the order of the petals. You can also use the

**graphing calculator**as shown above, but make the θstep smaller to slow down the drawing of the graph.

Here are a couple more polar graphs (**Spirals** and **Lemniscates**) that you might see:

You might be asked to obtain the **equation of a polar function** from a graph:

Here’s another type of question you may get asked when studying polar graphs.

**Problem:**

For the **rose polar graph** \(5\sin \left( {10\theta } \right)\): find the length of each petal, number of petals, spacing between each petal, and the tip of the 1^{st} petal in Quadrant I.

**Solution:**

The length of each petal in the rose polar graph is *a*, so this length is **5**. Since *b* (10) is even, we need to double it to get the number of petals, so we get **20**. The spacing between each petal is 360° divided by 20 = **18°**, since there are 360° in a circle. The tip of the 1^{st} petal in Quadrant I will be at 90 divided by *b*, which would be at 90 divided by 10, or **9**°.

# Converting Equations from Rectangular to Polar

To convert **Rectangular Equations** to **Polar Equations**, we want to **get rid of** the ** x**’s and

**’s and only have**

*y***’s and/or**

*r***θ**’s in the answer. We can do this with the following equations:

Here are some examples; **note that we want to solve for r if we can**; in the case of

**quadratics**or higher degrees, this may involve moving everything to one side and factoring.

Note that when we also get *r***= 0** (the pole) for the answers; this is one point only, and in these cases, the pole is included in the other part of the answers. Thus, we can discard *r***= 0**.

# Converting Equations from Polar to Rectangular

To convert **Polar Equations** to **Rectangular Equations**, we want to **get rid of** the ** r**’s and

**θ**’s and only have

**’s and/or**

*x***’s in the answer. We can do this with the following equations, depending on what we have in the polar equation:**

*y*Here are some examples. Note that sometimes we may be asked to **Complete the Square** to get the equation in a circle form; we learned how to do this in the **Factoring Quadratics and Completing the Square** section here.

# Polar Graph Points of Intersection

To find the intersection points for sets of polar curves, it’s helpful to draw the curves and also to solve algebraically. **To solve algebraically, we just set the r’s together and solve for the θ.**

Note also that after we solve for one variable (like θ), we have to plug it back in either equation to get the other coordinate (like r).

We also have to be careful since there are “**phantom**” or “**elusive**” points, typically at the pole. The reason these points are “phantom” is because, although we don’t necessarily get them algebraically, we can see them on a graph. This is because, with an “* r*” of 0, the θ could really be anything, since we aren’t going out any distance.

We will also see phantom points when one of the equations is “*r* = constant”, since another way to write this is “*r* = the negative of that constant”.

Note that with “phantom” points, both equations do not have to work; I know, it’s weird. To get all these elusive points, you put in the *r* value in both curves to see what additional points you get.

Find the intersection points for the following sets of polar curves (algebraically) and also draw a sketch. Find the intersections when θ is between **0 and 2 π**.

It also might be good to know the sequence in which the polar graphs are drawn; in other words, from 0 to 2*π*, which parts of the graphs are drawn before the other graphs. (Check it out on a graphing calculator, where you can see it!)

You can use a **t-chart**, or **set the polar equation to 0** if the graph crosses the pole, and test points in between. Here are some examples:

**Learn these rules, and practice, practice, practice!**

Click on Submit (the arrow to the right of the problem) to solve this problem. You can also type in more problems, or click on the 3 dots in the upper right hand corner to drill down for example problems.

If you click on “Tap to view steps”, you will go to the **Mathway** site, where you can register for the **full version** (steps included) of the software. You can even get math worksheets.

You can also go to the **Mathway** site here, where you can register, or just use the software for free without the detailed solutions. There is even a Mathway App for your mobile device. Enjoy!

On to **Trig Form of a Complex Number **– you are ready!

A minor correction:

In your Limacon “bean” you state: when a>b, B is greater so it’s a bean.

In that inequality a is greater.

Another way one might remember it is “a>b, the arrow points to ‘b’, ‘b’ean”

Have a nice day

Thank you SO SO MUCH! Please let me know if you see anything else 😉 Lisa

Check the chart that is just below this:

Here are some polar equations that result in lines:

The second row is about a vertical line, but the first sentence says: I remember that this line is horizontal. Small error to be fixed…..

Glad I found your site, it is going to help with my review before taking a teacher test.

What tools/software do you use to make such nice graphs and equations?

Thanks for writing! I use Mathtype in Microsoft Word (and do a lot of screen shots) and the Graph program (https://www.padowan.dk/) for the graphs. I also use the TI-Smartview program to generate the graphing calculator pictures. I also use MathJax in WordPress to render the inline equations. I eventually want to eliminate my screen shots, since they are somewhat blurry. Let me know if you have any questions 😉 Lisa