# Solving Quadratics by Factoring and Completing the Square

This section covers:

Note that factoring the difference of cubes, and more advanced factoring, including Factoring with Exponents can be found here in the Rational Expressions and Functions section, and Solving by Factoring section.

Again, there are several ways to solve quadratics, or find the solution (also known as the x-intercepts, roots, zeros, or values) to a quadratic equation.  (Remember that we solve quadratic equations most easily by getting everything to one side of the equal sign, which sets the quadratic to 0).

In this section, we’ll talk about two other ways:

• Factoring and setting factors to 0  (there are many ways to factor, but not everything can be factored)
• Completing the square and taking the square root of each side (a way where we don’t have to set the quadratic to 0!)

# Factoring Methods

Note that there is more information on factoring in the Solving by Factoring section here.

So just the way we learned how to multiply binomials (via FOILING), we need to learn how to do the opposite, or factor (or “unfoil”) the resulting trinomials.   After we’ve done enough multiplying binomials and factoring trinomials, this will become second nature.

We’ll also learn other basic polynomial factoring methods, like taking out the Greatest Common Factors (GCF) of polynomials, and factoring the difference of two squares and factoring perfect square trinomials.

Think of factoring as just “pulling apart” things that are multiplied together.  It’s the same principle of factoring 35 and getting 5 and 7.  When we factor in algebra, we do the same thing, but with variables.

NOTE:  Remember that when we factor, we want to set each factor with a variable in it to 0, and solve for the variable to get the roots.  This is because any factor that becomes 0 makes the whole expression 0.  (This is the zero product property: if ab = 0, than a = 0 and/or b = 0).

Also remember that when we factor to solve quadratics or any polynomials, we can never just divide by factors (with variables) on both sides to get rid of them.  If we do this, we may be missing solutions!

Note that not every quadratic can be factored; if it can’t, we’ll have to use one of the other methods.

But let’s learn the factoring techniques so we can solve the quadratics that can be factored; it’s a pretty simple way to solve them.  And later, when we learn how to solve more generic polynomials in the Graphing and Solving Polynomial Functions section, we’ll know how to factor!

## Taking out the Greatest Common Factor (GCF)

So let’s first start with polynomials that need some simple factoring.  We always need to pull out the GCF (largest coefficients/variables that go into all the terms) first.  (We learned about the GCF with regular numbers in the Multiplying and Dividing Section here.)

Remember from the Exponents and Radicals in Algebra section that we add exponents when we multiply with the same base, and subtract exponents when we divide with the same base.

Here are some examples of factoring polynomials by taking the GCF out:

See how it’s reversing the distributive property?  It’s “undistributing”.  And it’s always a good idea to multiply back to check your answers!

When we factor quadratics, we try to “unfoil” to get two binomials.  Again, remember that when factoring trinomials, we always need to take out any GCF’s first!

And remember that this method does not always work; certain quadratics are “unfactorable” (prime), and must be solved with another method.  Also remember that, with a trinomial, if the discriminant  where a, b, and c are from , isn’t a perfect square (like 25 or 49), you can’t factor it.

Here are some methods that we use:

### Guess and Check

“Guess and Check” is just what it sounds; we have certain rules, but we try combinations to see what will work.

Let’s start with an example; let’s “UNFOIL” or factor one of the first examples that we worked with in Quadratics.  Here’s how we FOIL’ed, and how we “UNFOIL”:

So if we were to solve this trinomial, we would set the factors equal to zero:

Note the signs when you “unfoil”;  multiply these back to make sure they work:

Sometimes it’s easier and more visual if you use an “X” when you begin to factor these; we’ll first show this when there are no numbers (coefficients) before the x2 term.  We can put the coefficient of the middle term on the top, the constant term (no variable) on the bottom, and then use the two sides to find 2 numbers multiplied together to equal the bottom, but added together to equal the top.

Let’s try this for the last problem above:

Let’s try another one that’s a little bit more complicated.

Note again that to make the factoring easier, we always want to factor the GCF out of the polynomial before we “unfoil”.

Example:

Let’s factor .  First we take out the GCF (2) to get :

We still need to “unfoil” .  This is a little more complicated, since we have the 4x2.  Now we need two factors of 4 and two factors of 7, so that multiplying the inside terms and multiplying the outside terms and adding them together will give us  –11.

We can see that this trinomial is factorable, since  (the discriminant) is which is a perfect square.

When we’re “guessing and checking”, we’re actually “foiling back” to see if we got the right answer!  You may want to use your factor trees (that we learned in the Multiplying and Dividing section) to write down all the factors of the first and last coefficients.

Here are all the combinations we could have.  Note that the factors of 4 are 2 and 2, or 4 and 1.  The factors of 7 are just 7 and 1.

So the complete factoring is:  2(4x – 7)(x – 1).  If we were to solve this trinomial, we would get  by setting each factor to 0 and solving for x.  (Ignore the factor of 2, since 2 can never be 0.  If we had an x on the outside, an additional factor would be 0).

Note that if we had , we’d also have to split the y’s at the end, so we would factor to 2(4x – 7y)(x – y).  Multiply it all to together to show that it works!  (This is one we wouldn’t be asked to solve).

## Special Products of Binomials – Easily Factored

There are two special cases where you can use a shortcut to factor the trinomials: Difference of Two Squares and Perfect Square Trinomials.  We saw these in the Introduction to Polynomials section in the table here.

Here are the two cases and how to factor them:

## Grouping Method, or the “ac” Method

The Grouping Method for factoring trinomials has gotten more popular since the FOILing hasn’t been taught as much recently.  (The reason it’s not taught as much is because it can be only used with binomial multiplication.  I still like FOILing since I believe learning to factor is easier if we learn FOILing first).

We will turn the trinomial into a quadratic with four terms, to be able to do the grouping.  Then we have to find a pattern of binomials so we can use the distributive property to put them together (like a puzzle!).

Let’s look at the same problem as above (with the 2 already factored out, but let’s keep the y’s at the end):

Let’s use our “X” again to help us solve by the grouping method.

We can put the middle term’s coefficient (–11) on the top part of the “X”, but this time we multiply the first and last coefficients  (4  x  7 = 28) and put it on bottom part of an “X”.  Remember that the sign of a term comes before it, and pay attention to signs.

So since we found that –4  and –7 “work”, we can rewrite the trinomial and separate the middle term, so we can do some grouping and factor with the grouping method:

## Grouping Method with Four Terms

Here are some examples of the grouping method when we start out with 4 terms.  Notice that the first one is a 4-term quadratic and the second is a cubic polynomial that includes factoring with the difference of squares.

Remember the difference of squares factoring is

Note that having four terms to factor doesn’t always work with the grouping method above; sometimes we have to look for differences of squares (sometimes combined with the grouping method):

## The Box Method

One more method that is getting popular is called the “box” method.  This is a modified “ac” method, but we use greatest common factors (GCF) to help us factor.

This is sort of the opposite of what we did with the “multiplication box” earlier.

We put the first term in the upper left hand corner, the last term in the lower right hand corner, and we divide up the middle term in the remaining two corners so they add up to the middle term, and are factors of the first term times the last term (thus, the “ac” method).  You can put the middle terms (upper right and lower left corners) in any order, but make sure the signs are correct so they add up to the middle term.

If you have set up the box correctly, the diagonals should multiply to the same product.

Then we get the GCFs across the columns and down the rows, using the same sign of the closest box (boxes either on the left or the top).

Let’s try this for :

Then read across and down to get the factors:  (5x + 2)(2x – 3).  Foil it back, and we see that we got it correct!  If we were to solve this trinomial, we would get  by setting each factor to 0 and solving for x.

Note: when we do the box method, we have to make sure the x2 has a positive coefficient;  otherwise, we have to take the negative out across all three terms, do the factoring, and then put the negative in the front of the factored answer.

## The “ac” Method without Grouping

There’s another new method to factor trinomials out there and it’s kind of cool.  It’s similar to the “ac” method above, but a little simpler.  Again, let’s use :

# Completing the Square (Square Root Method)

Completing the square is what is says: we take a quadratic in standard form  and manipulate it to have a binomial square in it, like .  This way we can solve it by isolating the binomial square (getting it on one side) and taking the square root of each side.  This is commonly called the square root method.

We can also complete the square to find the vertex more easily, since the vertex form is .

What we want to do for the square root method is to make a square out of the side with the variable, and move the numbers (constants) to the other side, so we can take the square root of both sides.  Then we don’t have to use the quadratic equation, or “unfoil” to solve.

Let’s first think about what happens when we square a binomial by looking at:

(We first saw these perfect square trinomials in Introduction To Polynomials.)

Since we add the product of the middle terms twice, we have twice the product of the first (x) and second (3) terms in the middle (to get 6x).  See also how we have the square of the second term (3) at the end (9).

So to complete the square of a trinomial that isn’t a perfect square, we need to halve the second term and take the square of it – and then add that number so the square can be complete.  Then we have to make sure to add the same thing to the other side.

Then we take the square root of each side, remember that we need to include the plus and minus of the right hand side, since by definition, the square root is just the positive.  Another way to think of it is the absolute value of the left side equals the right side, so we have to include the plus and minus of the right side.

(Note: you may want to review Solving Exponential and Radical Equations to review how to solve square root equations.)

Let’s work with  first, since it just starts with an  (coefficient of  of 1):

Note that it would have been much easier to factor this quadratic, but, like the quadratic equation, we can use the completing the square method for any quadratic. (We may not always get a real number for the answer(s); we’ll talk about imaginary numbers later).

Here’s one that’s a little trickier, because of the radical in the coefficient of x:

Here’s one where the coefficient of the  isn’t 1.  (Remember again that if we can take out any factors across the whole trinomial, do it first and complete the square with the trinomial only.)  This gets a little more complicated, but it’s not too bad:

## Completing the Square to get Vertex Form

We can use the same technique to put  (standard form, or  ) into vertex form ().  In this case, we want to leave everything on one side, so we have to undo what we’ve added or subtracted by completing the square:

Note:  There is another way to convert from Standard Form to Vertex Form.   We can use a General Vertex Form equation   $$y=a{{\left( {x+\frac{b}{{2a}}} \right)}^{2}}-\frac{{{{b}^{2}}-4ac}}{{4a}}$$.  Let’s try this for the example above:  a = 2, b = –5, and c = –12.    We would get  $$y=a{{\left( {x+\frac{b}{{2a}}} \right)}^{2}}-\frac{{{{b}^{2}}-4a}}{{4a}}=2{{\left( {x+\frac{{-5}}{{2\left( 2 \right)}}} \right)}^{2}}-\frac{{{{{\left( {-5} \right)}}^{2}}-4\left( 2 \right)\left( {-12} \right)}}{{4\left( 2 \right)}}=2{{\left( {x-\frac{5}{4}} \right)}^{2}}\,\,-\,\,\frac{{121}}{8}\,\,$$.   Pretty cool!

# Obtaining Quadratic Equations from a Graph or Points

Sometimes you will be asked to look at a quadratic graph (or given the vertex and a point) and write the equation (in all three forms) for that graph.  The easiest way to do this is to find the vertex from the graph (usually it’s obvious!), put the equation in vertex form, and then compute the “a”  (coefficient of ) from another point on the graph, such as a root or y-intercept, if given.

If you’re given the x-intercepts (roots), you can also put it in factored form, and use another point (not one of the roots) to find the “a” part of the equation.  Remember that the “a” in all three forms (standard, factored, and vertex) will be the same.

Here are some examples:

Here’s another type of problem you might see where you have to write a Quadratic Function given a Parabola’s Axis of Symmetry and two Non-Vertex Points.  Note that we have to use a System of Equations:

So again, here are different forms of Quadratics and also the methods for finding roots of Quadratics.

Note that the “a” (coefficient of the ) is the same for all three forms!

Note:  Sometimes we’ll have a Quadratic in “almost” vertex form and play around with it to get it in vertex form.  For example, if we have   $$y=-8{{\left( {\frac{1}{2}x+2} \right)}^{2}}+3$$  and want to change it to vertex form, we can take out the  coefficient of x and do some algebra:  $$y=-8{{\left( {\frac{1}{2}x+2} \right)}^{2}}+3=-8{{\left( {\left( {\frac{1}{2}} \right)\left( {x+4} \right)} \right)}^{2}}+3$$$$=-8{{\left( {\frac{1}{2}} \right)}^{2}}{{\left( {x+4} \right)}^{2}}+3=-2{{\left( {x+4} \right)}^{2}}+3$$,  so the vertex is (–4, 3).

Note:  if we are really having a difficult time factoring a quadratic trinomial, we could, as a last resort, use the Quadratic Formula, get the roots, and, if they are rational (integers or fractions), put the quadratic back in factored form.  For example, if we used the Quadratic Formula and got roots  and –3, our factors would be .

Learn these rules, and practice, practice, practice!

Click on Submit (the arrow to the right of the problem) to solve this problem. You can also type in more problems, or click on the 3 dots in the upper right hand corner to drill down for example problems.

If you click on “Tap to view steps”, you will go to the Mathway site, where you can register for the full version (steps included) of the software.  You can even get math worksheets.

You can also go to the Mathway site here, where you can register, or just use the software for free without the detailed solutions.  There is even a Mathway App for your mobile device.  Enjoy!

## 19 thoughts on “Solving Quadratics by Factoring and Completing the Square”

1. Help! Math is not my forte and my daughter is struggling with competing the square- square root method. Her big question is why does the x term ostensibly disappear after taking half of the coefficient and then squaring it? While she doesn’t understand the reasoning re: the formula that requires that she take half the coef. then square it, she can do it, but the next step feels like voodoo to her (me too!). Can someone please explain in detail what leads to that jump? Thanks in advance and light to whomever can help! We have visited several touted websites w/ videos and my last resort was to put the word “girls” in front of our search on this topic! I am just so happy to have an opportunity to ask the question!

• Hi!
Thanks so much for your questions and hope this helps. The x term “disappears” because if you were to FOIL (multiply) it back out, it would be there. So for example (x + 1)^2 doesn’t really have an x term, but x^2 + 2x + 1 does. So when you add the squared to the binomial (like (x + 1)^2), the x term is in there – but you just don’t see it.

Does that make sense?
(I know this is a dated comment, but wanted to put it on the site 🙂

2. The article was nicely and fully explained. Since solving quadratic equations is a main core subject of high school math, studies on solving methods has been numerous and diversified. There are so far 8 existing common solving methods. They are: graphing, completing the square, factoring FOIL Method, quadratic formula, the Bluma Method, the Diagonal Sum Method, the improved factoring AC Method, and recently the New Transforming Method (Yahoo and Google Search) that may be the fastest and simplest solving method. I sincerely suggest that the article’s author keeps tracks of the new methods and explains them to students.

• Thank you so much for your comment, and I will certainly investigate these new methods and add to my blog. Thanks again! Lisa

3. Thank you, Lisa. Very glad that you respond to my comments.
I sincerely suggest that you read these articles:
– Best method to solve quadratic equation (Math Concentration website)
– Best methods to solve quadratic inequalities (Math Concentration website)
– Solving quadratic equations by the new Transforming Method (Adobe Edu Exchange)
– Quadratic equations – Compare the factoring AC Method and the new Transforming Method (Math Concentration)
– Quadratic equations – Compare the factoring AC Method and the Diagonal Sum Method (Math Concentration)
– Solving quadratic equations by the Diagonal Sum Method (Math Concentration)
– Shortcut in solving linear equations (Math Concentration)

4. thank you so much factorizing by completing square method is done to me

5. there is a mistake in the ‘Grouping Method with 4 Terms’ the 25z squared is written as 5z squared….

• Thank you so much for finding the error; I’ve fixed it. Let me know if you find any other mistakes 😉 Lisa

6. There is another way to convert f(x) = ax^2 +bx + c to vertex form f(x) = a*(x + p)^2 + q by using the general vertex form:
f(x) = a*(x + b/2a)^2 – d^2/4a, where d^2 = b^2 – 4ac, and (-b/2a) is the x-coordinate of the parabola axis. By replacing values of a, b, c into the general form, we get the specific vertex form.
Example: Convert f(x) = 2x^2 – 5x – 12 to vertex form.
We have: a = 2; (b/2a) = -5/4; and d^2 = b^2 – 4ac = 121; and (-d^2/4a) = -121/8.
Answer. Vertex form: f(x) = 2*(x – 5/4)^2 – 121/8.

• Thanks so much for the tip – I’m going to add it to my webpage now. Let me know if you have other examples! lisa

7. Example. Convert y = 2x^2 + 9x + 10 to vertex form.
Solution. a = 2; and (-b/2a) = -9/4, and d^2 = (b^2 – 4ac) = 81 – 80 = 1 –>(- d^2/4a) = -1/8
Answer. Vertex form: y = 2*(x + 9/4) – 1/8.
Note. We also can convert a quadratic equation in intercept form, with radical roots, to vertex form by using the general expression;
y = a*(x – x1)(x – x2) = a*(x – b/2a + d/2a)(x – b/2a – d/2a), with d^2 = b^2 – 4ac,
Exp. Convert y = (x – 2/3 + sqr.3/3)(x – 2/3 – sqr.3/3) to vertex form.
Solution. a = 9; and (x1 + x2)/2 = -2/3 –> x-coordinate of vertex = -2/3
y-coordinate of vertex: f(-2/3) = 9*(sqr.3/3)*(-sqr.3/3) =- 9*(3/9) = -3.
Answer: y = 9(x + 2/3)^2 – 3.

8. thanks for the articles .is there any techniques to cancel terms,like adding on both sides etc